AI Plugin Indexrespond-to-review alternatives
The most used alternatives to respond-to-review are gh-attach, repo-architecture, scikit-learn. All are developer tools skills with an active GitHub repository, ranked below by GitHub stars and recent activity.
| # | Skill | What it does | Runs | Updated | Stars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ref | respond-to-review rome-os | Address pull request review feedback, make focused changes, and summarize the outcome in one short reply. Use when the user asks to handle, address, or respond to review comments. Not for requesting or performing a code review. | Skill | 4 days ago | 829 |
| 1 | gh-attach github | Uploads a local file (screenshot, image, PDF, zip, video) to GitHub user-attachments, downloads GitHub user-attachments, and embeds local files in a PR, issue, or comment. Use when asked to "attach a screenshot to the PR", "add an image to the issue", "embed before/after screenshots", "attach this file", or "download this GitHub attachment". Powered by `gh-attach`. | Skill | yesterday | 40k |
| 2 | repo-architecture garrytan | Where new brain files go. Decision protocol for filing brain pages by primary subject, not by format or source. Reference for all brain-writing skills. | Skill | yesterday | 31k |
| 3 | scikit-learn sickn33 | Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. Use for classification, regression, clustering, model evaluation, and ML pipelines. | Skill | yesterday | 48k |
| 4 | pull-requests Effect-TS | Pull request finalization. Use when a change works and is about to be opened as a pull request, or when updating or continuing an existing one. | Skill | yesterday | 17k |
| 5 | harness-mint ruvnet | Scaffold a custom AI agent harness via `metaharness new {name} --template {id} --host {id}`. Defaults to DRY-RUN (no writes) unless --confirm is passed. Refuses to write to the calling repo root or anywhere inside it. Honors ADR-150 architectural constraint + ruflo's "destructive-action confirmation" pattern. | Skill | yesterday | 79k |
| 6 | doc davila7 | Use when the task involves reading, creating, or editing `.docx` documents, especially when formatting or layout fidelity matters; prefer `python-docx` plus the bundled `scripts/render_docx.py` for visual checks. | Skill | yesterday | 33k |
| 7 | prowler prowler-cloud | Main entry point for Prowler development - quick reference for all components. Trigger: General Prowler development questions, project overview, component navigation (NOT PR CI gates or GitHub Actions workflows). | Skill | 4 days ago | 15k |
| 8 | conversion-issues openvinotoolkit | Investigate and fix model conversion issues in OpenVINO Frontends (ONNX, PyTorch) — triage, debugging, accuracy comparison, and pre-submission verification. | Skill | 4 days ago | 11k |
| 9 | build-game-inventory MengTo | Build or repair game inventory, loot, equipment, tooltips, drag-and-drop, persistence, and progression systems. Use for item schemas, pickup flows, stack rules, equipment slots, atomic swaps, save migration, and no-loss regression testing. | Skill | 6 days ago | 6.9k |
| 10 | code-review langchain-ai | Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues. | Skill | 4 days ago | 30k |
| 11 | unit-testing NativeScript | How to run and write unit tests in this workspace (Vitest, colocated .spec.ts files, mocked native globals). Use when writing, changing, or running tests. | Skill | 4 days ago | 26k |
| 12 | python-repl gptme | Interactive Python REPL automation with common helpers and best practices | Skill | 4 days ago | 4.5k |
Questions
What is the best alternative to respond-to-review?
By usage, gh-attach is the most popular alternative, with 40k GitHub stars. The right choice depends on which features and hosting you need.
Is respond-to-review still maintained?
Its last commit was 4 days ago. You can see current activity on its listing page.