cross-review alternatives
The most used alternatives to cross-review are meeting-distiller-pro, function_health, plan-mode. All are productivity skills with an active GitHub repository, ranked below by GitHub stars and recent activity.
| # | Skill | What it does | Runs | Updated | Stars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ref | cross-review omnigent-ai | Verify an implementer's diff with an INDEPENDENT, different-vendor sub-agent (diff plus contract only); turn blocking issues into fix-tasks and loop until clean. | Skill | today | 11k |
| 1 | meeting-distiller-pro sickn33 | Transform messy meeting notes and transcripts into structured action items, decisions, and follow-ups. Never lose a meeting insight again. | Skill | today | 48k |
| 2 | function_health asgeirtj | Retrieve lab biomarker results and clinician notes from Function Health. | Skill | today | 70k |
| 3 | plan-mode nearai | Structured planning mode for autonomous task execution. Creates plans as MemoryDocs, executes via Missions, tracks progress with live checklist. | Skill | yesterday | 13k |
| 4 | beads gastownhall | Dolt-powered issue tracker for multi-session work with dependencies and persistent memory across conversation compaction. Use when work spans sessions, has blockers, or needs context recovery after compaction. Trigger with "create task", "what's ready", "track this work", "resume after compaction". Make sure to use this skill whenever managing multi-session work, tracking dependencies, or recovering context. | Skill | today | 28k |
| 5 | make-plan thedotmack | Create a detailed, phased implementation plan with documentation discovery. Use when asked to plan a feature, task, or multi-step implementation — especially before executing with do. | Skill | today | 103k |
| 6 | patterns langroid | Design patterns for the Langroid multi-agent LLM framework. Covers agent configuration, tools, task control, and integrations. | Skill | today | 4.1k |
| 7 | setup-help sickn33 | Setup-help guides a user through a setup or installation one step at a time. Each reply shows the current step and a short list of the remaining steps. It is aimed at users who need step-by-step help configuring something. | Skill | yesterday | 48k |
| 8 | bulletmind sickn33 | Convert input into clean, structured, hierarchical bullet points for summarization, note-taking, and structured thinking. | Skill | today | 48k |
| 9 | writing-plans sickn33 | Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code | Skill | today | 48k |
| 10 | lark-shared larksuite | Use for lark-cli setup/auth tasks: auth login/status/logout, user vs bot identity, business-domain permissions (--domain, including all/docs/drive), missing scopes, revoking authorization, or handling _notice JSON. | Skill | yesterday | 18k |
| 11 | task-review dataelement | L1 任务级代码审查。在每个任务完成后执行轻量级约定合规检查, 确保架构红线和编码约定在任务级别被守住,不让违规累积到特性级审查(L2)才发现。 用法:/task-review <feature_dir> <task_id> TRIGGER when: 用户完成了一个 SDD 任务(实现或测试),或者用户使用 /task-review 命令。 | Skill | today | 12k |
| 12 | maka-cli apache | Coordinate Maka CLI as a worker to submit tasks, inspect progress, update saved models, and handle Session questions or approvals. | Skill | today | 5.9k |
Questions
What is the best alternative to cross-review?
By usage, meeting-distiller-pro is the most popular alternative, with 48k GitHub stars. The right choice depends on which features and hosting you need.
Is cross-review still maintained?
Its last commit was today. You can see current activity on its listing page.