AI Plugin Indexarxiv-2608-05199-post-hoc-trajectory-risk-certification-for-modular alternatives
The most used alternatives to arxiv-2608-05199-post-hoc-trajectory-risk-certification-for-modular are security-review, analyzing-kubernetes-audit-logs, review-code. All are security skills with an active GitHub repository, ranked below by GitHub stars and recent activity.
| # | Skill | What it does | Runs | Updated | Stars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ref | arxiv-2608-05199-post-hoc-trajectory-risk-certification-for-modular hiyenwong | Post-Hoc Trajectory-Risk Certification for Modular LLM-Based Security Agents (arXiv: 2608.05199) | Skill | 4 days ago | 3 |
| 1 | security-review codewhale-hq | Review a change, module, or surface for exploitable defects — trust boundaries, authn/authz, injection, secret exposure, filesystem and network reach, dependency risk. Use when the user asks for a security review, audit, or vulnerability check of concrete code. Not for general code review, lint, or compliance paperwork. | Skill | yesterday | 41k |
| 2 | analyzing-kubernetes-audit-logs mukul975 | Parses Kubernetes API server audit logs (JSON lines) to detect exec-into-pod, secret access, RBAC modifications, privileged pod creation, and anonymous API access, and builds SIEM detection rules from the event patterns. Use when investigating a suspected cluster compromise, reconstructing what an attacker did through the API server, or writing Kubernetes-specific detection content. Keywords: audit policy, audit log, kube-apiserver, exec into pod, RBAC change, anonymous access, detection rules. Do not use for syscall-level detection inside a running container - use detecting-container-runtime-threats-with-falco. ' | Skill | 1 month ago | 35k |
| 3 | review-code verdaccio | Review a verdaccio diff, branch, or pull request against the repository review guide (security first, then npm-client compatibility, performance, product fit, maintainability), verify each finding against the code, and report actionable issues. Use for code reviews and for reviewing your own changes before or during a PR workflow. | Skill | yesterday | 18k |
| 4 | slack-bot-builder sickn33 | Build Slack apps using the Bolt framework across Python, JavaScript, and Java. Covers Block Kit for rich UIs, interactive components, slash commands, event handling, OAuth installation flows, and Workflow Builder integration. | Skill | 5 days ago | 48k |
| 5 | redteam-cve-lookup Netw0rkNoob | CVE lookup and applicability assessment domain card. Use after reconnaissance has identified products, versions, services, or fingerprints and red-team mode needs evidence-based CVE matching before deeper testing. | Skill | 11 days ago | 3.8k |
| 6 | game-server-security gmh5225 | Review multiplayer authority, RPCs, sessions, authorization, replication, inventory, economy, purchases, retries, and replay. Use when server or backend state is the security boundary. | Skill | 4 days ago | 3.6k |
| 7 | reviewing-msbuild-code dotnet | Reviews MSBuild code changes using a 24-dimension methodology. Activates for code review, PR review, pull request analysis, design review, architecture review, code quality assessment, or style check of MSBuild code. Covers backwards compatibility, ChangeWave discipline, performance, allocation awareness, test coverage, error message quality, logging, string comparison, API surface, target authoring, cross-platform correctness, code simplification, concurrency, naming, SDK integration, evaluation model integrity, correctness, dependency management, security, and build infrastructure. | Skill | 4 days ago | 5.5k |
| 8 | supply-chain-security microsoft | Activate when reviewing or modifying dependency resolution, lockfile schema, package downloaders, signature/integrity checks, file integration cleanup, or anything that could expose APM to dependency confusion, typosquatting, malicious packages, or token leakage. | Skill | 4 days ago | 4.1k |
| 9 | code-review vstorm-co | Review Python code for quality, security, and best practices | Skill | 4 days ago | 1.1k |
| 10 | security-issue xrplevm | Create a security finding in the private peersyst/security repo with proper labels and format. Use when reporting a security vulnerability, concern, or observation found during audits or ad-hoc review. | Skill | 7 days ago | 1.4k |
| 11 | antinet-security-scan anbeime | 信息安全分析师与软件开发工程师在搭建文档处理流水线时，当需要拦截违规文件或外部URL，请挂载此技能作为强制前置安检，自动输出 pass/reject 判定与详细合规扫描报告，一键守住零信任安全底线。 | Skill | yesterday | 8.6k |
| 12 | reverse-skill-router zhaoxuya520 | Use the reverse-skill repository from Codex for authorized reverse engineering, security analysis, CTF, and defensive testing tasks. Requires the reverse-skill repository to be available as the current workspace or an explicitly supplied local path. | Skill | 1 month ago | 43k |
Questions
What is the best alternative to arxiv-2608-05199-post-hoc-trajectory-risk-certification-for-modular?
By usage, security-review is the most popular alternative, with 41k GitHub stars. The right choice depends on which features and hosting you need.
Is arxiv-2608-05199-post-hoc-trajectory-risk-certification-for-modular still maintained?
Its last commit was 4 days ago. You can see current activity on its listing page.