AI Plugin IndexVoicelayer MCP vs FunASR
Voicelayer MCP and FunASR are both media MCP servers. FunASR scores higher (94 vs 80 out of 100). FunASR has more GitHub stars (21k), and Voicelayer MCP was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| Voicelayer MCP | FunASR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | Voice I/O layer for AI coding assistants — local TTS, STT, session booking. MCP server. | Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference. |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:voicelayer-mcp | Community: modelscope |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 722 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 20,754 |
| Last commit | 20 Oct 2026 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install Voicelayer MCP | Install FunASR |
Questions
Is Voicelayer MCP or FunASR more popular?
FunASR has more GitHub stars: 20,754.
Can I use Voicelayer MCP and FunASR together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.