AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day

playwright-results vs browser-caching

playwright-results and browser-caching are both browser automation skills. browser-caching scores higher (87 vs 34 out of 100). browser-caching has more GitHub stars (75k), and browser-caching was updated more recently (17 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

playwright-resultsbrowser-caching
Score34 / 10087 / 100
What it doesAnalyze Playwright JSON results using stable workspace scripts. Use when users ask to review e2e failures, summarize test-results.json, or debug failed Playwright runs without ad-hoc inline scripts.Use when auditing slow page loads, heavy assets, or rendering delays related to Enable browser caching. Verify the actual bottleneck in DevTools, Lighthouse, or field data before recommending changes.
PublisherCommunity: tn02103Community: thedaviddias
GradesMaintenance A, Licence F, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a weekNot on npmNot on npm
RunsSkillSkill
Works withClaude Code, Claude appsClaude Code, Claude apps
GitHub stars274,518
Last commit23 Sept 20266 Oct 2026
LicenceNone foundMIT
Listed since19 Oct 202620 Oct 2026
Install playwright-resultsInstall browser-caching

Questions

Is playwright-results or browser-caching more popular?

browser-caching has more GitHub stars: 74,518.

Can I use playwright-results and browser-caching together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several skills at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.