Frameflow MCP vs FunASR
Frameflow MCP and FunASR are both media MCP servers. FunASR scores higher (94 vs 70 out of 100). FunASR has more GitHub stars (21k), and FunASR was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| Frameflow MCP | FunASR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | MCP server for Google image and video models (Nano Banana, Gemini Omni, Veo) on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, with a one-command service account setup for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex | Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference. |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:@saeedsakib | Community: modelscope |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 56 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 20,754 |
| Last commit | 29 Sept 2026 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install Frameflow MCP | Install FunASR |
Questions
Is Frameflow MCP or FunASR more popular?
FunASR has more GitHub stars: 20,754.
Can I use Frameflow MCP and FunASR together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.