AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Polotno vs browser-use

Polotno and browser-use are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 80 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and browser-use was updated more recently (3 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

Polotnobrowser-use
Score80 / 100100 / 100
What it doesDesign editor SDK: embed a Canva-like editor, generate designs from templates and data, export PNG, PDF, and video in the browser or on a server.Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.
PublisherVerified: npm:polotnoVerified: browser-use.com
GradesLicence F, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week19,837Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars0118,527
Last commit17 Oct 2026
LicenceNone foundMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install PolotnoInstall browser-use

Questions

Is Polotno or browser-use more popular?

browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.

Can I use Polotno and browser-use together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.