mcp-neo4j-aura-manager vs Supabase
mcp-neo4j-aura-manager and Supabase are both databases MCP servers. Supabase scores higher (97 vs 79 out of 100). Supabase has more GitHub stars (3k), and Supabase was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| mcp-neo4j-aura-manager | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79 / 100 | 97 / 100 |
| What it does | MCP server for Neo4j Aura Database Instance Manager. | MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform |
| Publisher | Community: neo4j-contrib | Verified: supabase.com |
| Grades | Maintenance B, Licence A, Quality B | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality B |
| npm downloads a week | Not on npm | 68,012 |
| Runs | Local | Local and remote |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 989 | 2,962 |
| Last commit | 9 Sept 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install mcp-neo4j-aura-manager | Install Supabase |
Questions
Is mcp-neo4j-aura-manager or Supabase more popular?
Supabase has more GitHub stars: 2,962.
Can I use mcp-neo4j-aura-manager and Supabase together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.