AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day

Tapo MCP vs Harness

Tapo MCP and Harness are both ai and llm tools MCP servers. Harness scores higher (95 vs 87 out of 100). Harness has more GitHub stars (1.3k), and Tapo MCP was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

Tapo MCPHarness
Score87 / 10095 / 100
What it doesMCP server for discovering and controlling TP-Link Tapo smart home devices via AI AgentsStart Claude Code and Codex agents the person can watch, wait for them and read their answers.
PublisherCommunity: mihai-dinculescuVerified: harness.autonomous.ai
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality AMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a weekNot on npmNot on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars8601,320
Last commit19 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since19 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install Tapo MCPInstall Harness

Questions

Is Tapo MCP or Harness more popular?

Harness has more GitHub stars: 1,320.

Can I use Tapo MCP and Harness together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.