AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day

MCP Bridge vs Harness

MCP Bridge and Harness are both ai and llm tools MCP servers. Harness scores higher (95 vs 78 out of 100). Harness has more GitHub stars (1.3k), and Harness was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

MCP BridgeHarness
Score78 / 10095 / 100
What it doesLocal MCP bridge for maind.dev — wraps any MCP-compatible client (Claude Code, Cursor, Devin Desktop, formerly Windsurf) and pins your API key to a single device via the maind device authorization flow.Start Claude Code and Codex agents the person can watch, wait for them and read their answers.
PublisherVerified: npm:@maind-devVerified: harness.autonomous.ai
GradesLicence B, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week1,441Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars01,320
Last commit19 Oct 2026
LicenceSEE LICENSE IN LICENSEMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install MCP BridgeInstall Harness

Questions

Is MCP Bridge or Harness more popular?

Harness has more GitHub stars: 1,320.

Can I use MCP Bridge and Harness together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.