MCP Bridge vs Harness
MCP Bridge and Harness are both ai and llm tools MCP servers. Harness scores higher (95 vs 78 out of 100). Harness has more GitHub stars (1.3k), and Harness was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| MCP Bridge | Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78 / 100 | 95 / 100 |
| What it does | Local MCP bridge for maind.dev — wraps any MCP-compatible client (Claude Code, Cursor, Devin Desktop, formerly Windsurf) and pins your API key to a single device via the maind device authorization flow. | Start Claude Code and Codex agents the person can watch, wait for them and read their answers. |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:@maind-dev | Verified: harness.autonomous.ai |
| Grades | Licence B, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 1,441 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1,320 |
| Last commit | 19 Oct 2026 | |
| Licence | SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install MCP Bridge | Install Harness |
Questions
Is MCP Bridge or Harness more popular?
Harness has more GitHub stars: 1,320.
Can I use MCP Bridge and Harness together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.