AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Executeautomation Playwright MCP Server vs browser-use

Executeautomation Playwright MCP Server and browser-use are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 74 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and browser-use was updated more recently (5 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

Executeautomation Playwright MCP Serverbrowser-use
Score74 / 100100 / 100
What it doesModel Context Protocol servers for PlaywrightBrowser agents and stealth cloud browsers for AI: run web tasks, fill forms, extract data.
PublisherVerified: npm:@iflow-mcpVerified: browser-use.com
GradesMaintenance D, Licence A, Quality BMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week3Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal and remote
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars5,669118,527
Last commit13 Dec 202517 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install Executeautomation Playwright MCP ServerInstall browser-use

Questions

Is Executeautomation Playwright MCP Server or browser-use more popular?

browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.

Can I use Executeautomation Playwright MCP Server and browser-use together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.