AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

macro-evidence vs discussion

macro-evidence and discussion are both search and web skills. discussion scores higher (84 vs 74 out of 100). discussion has more GitHub stars (5.9k), and macro-evidence was updated more recently (3 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

macro-evidencediscussion
Score74 / 10084 / 100
What it doesResearch macro releases, currency drivers, policy curves and positioning using FXMacroData tools and explicit source evidence. Use for macro briefs, release context and comparative currency research.Runs structured multi-agent discussions for open-ended typia topics. Use only when the user explicitly asks for Discussion or a team debate with transcripts and conclusions; do not use for Self-Review, a solo or multi-agent review, research review, or issue discovery.
PublisherCommunity: hashgraph-onlineCommunity: samchon
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality AMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a weekNot on npmNot on npm
RunsSkillSkill
Works withClaude Code, Claude appsClaude Code, Claude apps
GitHub stars1,3555,944
Last commit20 Oct 202615 Oct 2026
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Listed since20 Oct 202620 Oct 2026
Install macro-evidenceInstall discussion

Questions

Is macro-evidence or discussion more popular?

discussion has more GitHub stars: 5,944.

Can I use macro-evidence and discussion together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several skills at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.