PostgreSQL Performance (read-only) vs Supabase
PostgreSQL Performance (read-only) and Supabase are both databases MCP servers. Supabase scores higher (97 vs 30 out of 100). Supabase has more GitHub stars (3k), and Supabase was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| PostgreSQL Performance (read-only) | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 30 / 100 | 97 / 100 |
| What it does | Read-only PostgreSQL performance diagnostics: slow queries, EXPLAIN, index advice, locks, functions | MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform |
| Publisher | Community: gouranshul | Verified: supabase.com |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality B |
| npm downloads a week | Not on npm | 65,390 |
| Runs | Local | Local and remote |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2,962 |
| Last commit | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install PostgreSQL Performance (read-only) | Install Supabase |
Questions
Is PostgreSQL Performance (read-only) or Supabase more popular?
Supabase has more GitHub stars: 2,962.
Can I use PostgreSQL Performance (read-only) and Supabase together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.