AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day

Coseat MCP vs Harness

Coseat MCP and Harness are both ai and llm tools MCP servers. Harness scores higher (95 vs 76 out of 100). Harness has more GitHub stars (1.3k), and Harness was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

Coseat MCPHarness
Score76 / 10095 / 100
What it doesCoseat MCP server: let an AI agent work in a Coseat session — read the page and act, inside the scope you set, with every outward action waiting for your OK.Start Claude Code and Codex agents the person can watch, wait for them and read their answers.
PublisherVerified: npm:@coseatVerified: harness.autonomous.ai
GradesLicence A, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week418Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars01,320
Last commit19 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install Coseat MCPInstall Harness

Questions

Is Coseat MCP or Harness more popular?

Harness has more GitHub stars: 1,320.

Can I use Coseat MCP and Harness together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.