AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Video Extract vs FunASR

Video Extract and FunASR are both media MCP servers. FunASR scores higher (94 vs 80 out of 100). FunASR has more GitHub stars (21k), and Video Extract was updated more recently (5 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

Video ExtractFunASR
Score80 / 10094 / 100
What it doesDownload any video from a URL, or get its transcript and key frames. All local, no API keys.Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference.
PublisherVerified: yanlinglabs.comCommunity: modelscope
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week115Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars720,754
Last commit18 Oct 202618 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since19 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install Video ExtractInstall FunASR

Questions

Is Video Extract or FunASR more popular?

FunASR has more GitHub stars: 20,754.

Can I use Video Extract and FunASR together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.