Video Extract vs FunASR
Video Extract and FunASR are both media MCP servers. FunASR scores higher (94 vs 80 out of 100). FunASR has more GitHub stars (21k), and Video Extract was updated more recently (5 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| Video Extract | FunASR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | Download any video from a URL, or get its transcript and key frames. All local, no API keys. | Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference. |
| Publisher | Verified: yanlinglabs.com | Community: modelscope |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 115 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 7 | 20,754 |
| Last commit | 18 Oct 2026 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install Video Extract | Install FunASR |
Questions
Is Video Extract or FunASR more popular?
FunASR has more GitHub stars: 20,754.
Can I use Video Extract and FunASR together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.