Caveman Shrink vs N8n MCP
Caveman Shrink and N8n MCP are both knowledge and memory MCP servers. Caveman Shrink scores higher (94 vs 94 out of 100). Caveman Shrink has more GitHub stars (114k), and N8n MCP was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| Caveman Shrink | N8n MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | MCP proxy that compresses prose fields (tool descriptions, etc.) using caveman rules. Same accuracy, fewer context tokens. | Integration between n8n workflow automation and Model Context Protocol (MCP) |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:caveman-shrink | Verified: npm:n8n-mcp |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 1,525 | 51,963 |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 113,764 | 23,103 |
| Last commit | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Install Caveman Shrink | Install N8n MCP |
Questions
Is Caveman Shrink or N8n MCP more popular?
Caveman Shrink has more GitHub stars: 113,764.
Can I use Caveman Shrink and N8n MCP together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.