AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Camofox Browser MCP vs browser-use

Camofox Browser MCP and browser-use are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 94 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and browser-use was updated more recently (3 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

Camofox Browser MCPbrowser-use
Score94 / 100100 / 100
What it doesStandalone stdio MCP server exposing the camofox-browser REST API as MCP tools (Claude Code, Codex, agy, Cursor, opencode). Proxies to an already-running camofox-browser REST server — does not itself require the browser binary, Playwright, or the core serControl a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.
PublisherVerified: npm:@askjoVerified: browser-use.com
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality AMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week369Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars11,736118,527
Last commit16 Oct 202617 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install Camofox Browser MCPInstall browser-use

Questions

Is Camofox Browser MCP or browser-use more popular?

browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.

Can I use Camofox Browser MCP and browser-use together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.