MCP Server Ticktick vs Harness
MCP Server Ticktick and Harness are both ai and llm tools MCP servers. Harness scores higher (95 vs 69 out of 100). Harness has more GitHub stars (1.3k), and Harness was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| MCP Server Ticktick | Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69 / 100 | 95 / 100 |
| What it does | MCP server for using the TickTick API | Start Claude Code and Codex agents the person can watch, wait for them and read their answers. |
| Publisher | Verified: ai.npm:@alexarevalo | Verified: harness.autonomous.ai |
| Grades | Maintenance B, Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 26 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 73 | 1,320 |
| Last commit | 1 Sept 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install MCP Server Ticktick | Install Harness |
Questions
Is MCP Server Ticktick or Harness more popular?
Harness has more GitHub stars: 1,320.
Can I use MCP Server Ticktick and Harness together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.