AI Plugin IndexTalqing MCP vs FunASR
Talqing MCP and FunASR are both media MCP servers. FunASR scores higher (94 vs 77 out of 100). FunASR has more GitHub stars (21k), and FunASR was updated more recently (3 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| Talqing MCP | FunASR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | MCP server for building Talqing AI voice, video and text agents from Claude Code, Codex, or any MCP client. | Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference. |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:@talqing | Community: modelscope |
| Grades | Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 646 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 20,754 |
| Last commit | 18 Oct 2026 | |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install Talqing MCP | Install FunASR |
Questions
Is Talqing MCP or FunASR more popular?
FunASR has more GitHub stars: 20,754.
Can I use Talqing MCP and FunASR together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.