memory-pulse vs MCP Remote
memory-pulse and MCP Remote are both security MCP servers. MCP Remote scores higher (94 vs 78 out of 100). MCP Remote has more GitHub stars (1.6k), and MCP Remote was updated more recently (3 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| memory-pulse | MCP Remote | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | Give any agent self-improving memory you can trust in production. Built-in memory security. | Remote proxy for Model Context Protocol, allowing local-only clients to connect to remote servers using oAuth |
| Publisher | Community: t-crew | Verified: npm:mcp-remote |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 402 | 505,267 |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1,636 |
| Last commit | 16 Oct 2026 | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Install memory-pulse | Install MCP Remote |
Questions
Is memory-pulse or MCP Remote more popular?
MCP Remote has more GitHub stars: 1,636.
Can I use memory-pulse and MCP Remote together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.