Visual Memory MCP vs Agent-Native Plan
Visual Memory MCP and Agent-Native Plan are both design MCP servers. Agent-Native Plan scores higher (94 vs 80 out of 100). Agent-Native Plan has more GitHub stars (7.4k), and Agent-Native Plan was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| Visual Memory MCP | Agent-Native Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | Local visual UI cache for AI agents using perceptual hashing, CLIP, and 3D spatial grounding. | Structured visual plans and PR recaps with diagrams, prototypes, annotations, and sharing |
| Publisher | Community: putervision | Community: BuilderIO |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence F, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 4,132 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Remote |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf, ChatGPT |
| GitHub stars | 46 | 7,449 |
| Last commit | 8 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install Visual Memory MCP | Install Agent-Native Plan |
Questions
Is Visual Memory MCP or Agent-Native Plan more popular?
Agent-Native Plan has more GitHub stars: 7,449.
Can I use Visual Memory MCP and Agent-Native Plan together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.