AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Ottoport vs FunASR

Ottoport and FunASR are both media MCP servers. FunASR scores higher (94 vs 69 out of 100). FunASR has more GitHub stars (21k), and FunASR was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

OttoportFunASR
Score69 / 10094 / 100
What it doesClaude Code plugin, CLI and MCP server for OttoPort — one OpenAI-compatible API for every LLM, image, video, and speech model.Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference.
PublisherVerified: npm:ottoportCommunity: modelscope
GradesLicence A, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week627Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars020,754
Last commit18 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install OttoportInstall FunASR

Questions

Is Ottoport or FunASR more popular?

FunASR has more GitHub stars: 20,754.

Can I use Ottoport and FunASR together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.