three.ws Vision vs FunASR
three.ws Vision and FunASR are both media MCP servers. FunASR scores higher (94 vs 82 out of 100). FunASR has more GitHub stars (21k), and three.ws Vision was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| three.ws Vision | FunASR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | Image understanding for AI agents — analyze and describe any image via the three.ws pipeline. | Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference. |
| Publisher | Community: nirholas | Community: modelscope |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality B | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | Not on npm | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 241 | 20,754 |
| Last commit | 19 Oct 2026 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install three.ws Vision | Install FunASR |
Questions
Is three.ws Vision or FunASR more popular?
FunASR has more GitHub stars: 20,754.
Can I use three.ws Vision and FunASR together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.