AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Metaharness vs browser-use

Metaharness and browser-use are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 92 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and Metaharness was updated more recently (today). The table compares them side by side.

Metaharnessbrowser-use
Score92 / 100100 / 100
What it doesMetaHarness — mint a custom AI agent harness from any repo. Browser Studio + `npx metaharness` CLI. Runs on Claude Code, Codex, pi.dev, Hermes, OpenClaw, RVM, Prime Agent.Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.
PublisherVerified: npm:metaharnessVerified: browser-use.com
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality AMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week30,561Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars709118,527
Last commit20 Oct 202617 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install MetaharnessInstall browser-use

Questions

Is Metaharness or browser-use more popular?

browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.

Can I use Metaharness and browser-use together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.