Metaharness vs browser-use
Metaharness and browser-use are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 92 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and Metaharness was updated more recently (today). The table compares them side by side.
| Metaharness | browser-use | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
| What it does | MetaHarness — mint a custom AI agent harness from any repo. Browser Studio + `npx metaharness` CLI. Runs on Claude Code, Codex, pi.dev, Hermes, OpenClaw, RVM, Prime Agent. | Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights. |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:metaharness | Verified: browser-use.com |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 30,561 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 709 | 118,527 |
| Last commit | 20 Oct 2026 | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install Metaharness | Install browser-use |
Questions
Is Metaharness or browser-use more popular?
browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.
Can I use Metaharness and browser-use together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.