MCP Adapters vs Codebase Memory
MCP Adapters and Codebase Memory are both knowledge and memory MCP servers. Codebase Memory scores higher (94 vs 91 out of 100). Codebase Memory has more GitHub stars (47k), and MCP Adapters was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| MCP Adapters | Codebase Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | LangChain.js adapters for Model Context Protocol (MCP) | Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens. |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:@langchain | Community: DeusData |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality B | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 162,652 | 5,385 |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 18,284 | 46,937 |
| Last commit | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install MCP Adapters | Install Codebase Memory |
Questions
Is MCP Adapters or Codebase Memory more popular?
Codebase Memory has more GitHub stars: 46,937.
Can I use MCP Adapters and Codebase Memory together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.