AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Firecrawl MCP Server vs browser-use

Firecrawl MCP Server and browser-use are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 94 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and Firecrawl MCP Server was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

Firecrawl MCP Serverbrowser-use
Score94 / 100100 / 100
What it doesFirecrawl, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, interact with the web, plus paper search.Browser agents and stealth cloud browsers for AI: run web tasks, fill forms, extract data.
PublisherCommunity: firecrawlVerified: browser-use.com
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality AMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week102,401Not on npm
RunsLocal and remoteLocal and remote
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars7,638118,527
Last commit19 Oct 202617 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since19 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install Firecrawl MCP ServerInstall browser-use

Questions

Is Firecrawl MCP Server or browser-use more popular?

browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.

Can I use Firecrawl MCP Server and browser-use together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.