browser-use vs Camofox Browser MCP
browser-use and Camofox Browser MCP are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 94 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and browser-use was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| browser-use | Camofox Browser MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 100 / 100 | 94 / 100 |
| What it does | Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights. | Standalone stdio MCP server exposing the camofox-browser REST API as MCP tools (Claude Code, Codex, agy, Cursor, opencode). Proxies to an already-running camofox-browser REST server — does not itself require the browser binary, Playwright, or the core ser |
| Publisher | Verified: browser-use.com | Verified: npm:@askjo |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | Not on npm | 369 |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 118,527 | 11,736 |
| Last commit | 17 Oct 2026 | 16 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Install browser-use | Install Camofox Browser MCP |
Questions
Is browser-use or Camofox Browser MCP more popular?
browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.
Can I use browser-use and Camofox Browser MCP together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.