AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

browser-use vs Camofox Browser MCP

browser-use and Camofox Browser MCP are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 94 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and browser-use was updated more recently (4 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

browser-useCamofox Browser MCP
Score100 / 10094 / 100
What it doesControl a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.Standalone stdio MCP server exposing the camofox-browser REST API as MCP tools (Claude Code, Codex, agy, Cursor, opencode). Proxies to an already-running camofox-browser REST server — does not itself require the browser binary, Playwright, or the core ser
PublisherVerified: browser-use.comVerified: npm:@askjo
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality AMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a weekNot on npm369
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars118,52711,736
Last commit17 Oct 202616 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since19 Oct 202620 Oct 2026
Install browser-useInstall Camofox Browser MCP

Questions

Is browser-use or Camofox Browser MCP more popular?

browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.

Can I use browser-use and Camofox Browser MCP together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.