browser-use vs Actionbook
browser-use and Actionbook are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 95 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and Actionbook was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| browser-use | Actionbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 100 / 100 | 95 / 100 |
| What it does | Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights. | Let your AI agent operate any website through a real, logged-in browser session. |
| Publisher | Verified: browser-use.com | Verified: actionbook.app |
| Grades | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | Not on npm | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Remote |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf, ChatGPT |
| GitHub stars | 118,527 | 1,619 |
| Last commit | 17 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Listed since | 19 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install browser-use | Install Actionbook |
Questions
Is browser-use or Actionbook more popular?
browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.
Can I use browser-use and Actionbook together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.