AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Bugtape vs Harness

Bugtape and Harness are both ai and llm tools MCP servers. Harness scores higher (95 vs 81 out of 100). Harness has more GitHub stars (1.3k), and Harness was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.

BugtapeHarness
Score81 / 10095 / 100
What it doesBugTape CLI: connect Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or Grok to your production bugs over MCP. Replay, request, console and stack for every user-reported or silent failure.Start Claude Code and Codex agents the person can watch, wait for them and read their answers.
PublisherVerified: npm:bugtapeVerified: harness.autonomous.ai
GradesLicence A, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week2,000Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars01,320
Last commit19 Oct 2026
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install BugtapeInstall Harness

Questions

Is Bugtape or Harness more popular?

Harness has more GitHub stars: 1,320.

Can I use Bugtape and Harness together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.