Bugtape vs Harness
Bugtape and Harness are both ai and llm tools MCP servers. Harness scores higher (95 vs 81 out of 100). Harness has more GitHub stars (1.3k), and Harness was updated more recently (2 days ago). The table compares them side by side.
| Bugtape | Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81 / 100 | 95 / 100 |
| What it does | BugTape CLI: connect Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or Grok to your production bugs over MCP. Replay, request, console and stack for every user-reported or silent failure. | Start Claude Code and Codex agents the person can watch, wait for them and read their answers. |
| Publisher | Verified: npm:bugtape | Verified: harness.autonomous.ai |
| Grades | Licence A, Quality C | Maintenance A, Licence A, Quality A |
| npm downloads a week | 2,000 | Not on npm |
| Runs | Local | Local |
| Works with | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf | Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1,320 |
| Last commit | 19 Oct 2026 | |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Listed since | 20 Oct 2026 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Install Bugtape | Install Harness |
Questions
Is Bugtape or Harness more popular?
Harness has more GitHub stars: 1,320.
Can I use Bugtape and Harness together?
Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.