AdYour product here, seen by people installing AI tools every day Sponsor slots open: 12 of 12, from $249 a month

Arena Bridge vs browser-use

Arena Bridge and browser-use are both browser automation MCP servers. browser-use scores higher (100 vs 87 out of 100). browser-use has more GitHub stars (119k), and Arena Bridge was updated more recently (today). The table compares them side by side.

Arena Bridgebrowser-use
Score87 / 100100 / 100
What it doesGive a cloud AI agent (Arena.ai Agent Mode, Claude, Cursor, ...) controlled access to your own machine over HTTP/MCP: files, shell, Chrome and the macOS desktop, with an approval gate, trust windows and an audit log.Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.
PublisherVerified: npm:arena-bridgeVerified: browser-use.com
GradesMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality CMaintenance A, Licence A, Quality A
npm downloads a week6,382Not on npm
RunsLocalLocal
Works withClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, WindsurfClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf
GitHub stars0118,527
Last commit20 Oct 202617 Oct 2026
LicenceMITMIT
Listed since20 Oct 202619 Oct 2026
Install Arena BridgeInstall browser-use

Questions

Is Arena Bridge or browser-use more popular?

browser-use has more GitHub stars: 118,527.

Can I use Arena Bridge and browser-use together?

Yes. AI assistants can load several MCP servers at once. Install both and the assistant picks the right one for each task.